In short. The examination that separates lost volume from tissue that has moved, and why telling them apart decides the whole plan for a face in its 40s.

Key points

  • If supporting the cheek upwards removes most of what bothers you, position is the larger part of the problem.
  • If a hollow remains where the cheek used to be, some of it is genuine loss.
  • Most faces in their 40s show both.

The single most useful thing an assessment can establish at this age is which of two changes is present. They look similar in a bathroom mirror and they call for opposite answers.

Why the answer changes the plan

Lost volume is a shortage, and a shortage can be replaced. Descent is a change of position, and position is not corrected by adding material. If the tissue over the cheek has moved downwards, adding volume there increases the weight the face already carries in its lower half. A plan that does not distinguish the two cannot be sensible in either direction.

Light, and where the shadow sits

Most of what reads as a hollow or a fold is a shadow. In even, diffuse light, a face that has lost volume shows a broad, shallow shadow over the midface, roughly where the cheek used to sit forward. A face that has descended shows a shadow that is lower and sharper, running from the nose towards the mouth, with the cheek appearing to sit closer to the jaw.

Repose compared with movement

The face is examined relaxed and then smiling. Movement that makes a single deep line appear is a different finding from a shadow present all the time. It also shows whether the tissue moves as a sheet over the bone or whether the skin alone is folding, and that distinction cannot be seen in a still image.

The bone as the reference

The examination is conducted against the skeleton rather than against an earlier version of the face. Where the cheekbone projects, where the temple rim sits and how much of the midface is supported are fixed points, and judging against them says what is missing or what has moved. Judging against a photograph from a decade ago says only that time has passed.

What the examining hand checks

Whether the tissue can be repositioned upwards, how much of the fold resolves when it is, and whether the jawline softens when the cheek is supported. The mix of answers produces a proportion rather than a label, and that proportion is what the plan is built on.

The test is what happens when the tissue is supported

If supporting the cheek upwards removes most of what bothers you, position is the larger part of the problem. If a hollow remains where the cheek used to be, some of it is genuine loss. Most faces in their 40s show both.

Findings that are not an aesthetic question

  • Weakness, drooping or numbness on one side of the face, or a change that has appeared over days.
  • A firm lump, a lesion that bleeds, or a mark that is changing in size, shape or colour.
  • Facial change with weight loss, hair loss, or symptoms of a thyroid or other systemic condition.

Arrive at the appointment with photographs and with a description of when you first noticed the change. Leave able to say which finding the clinician considers dominant, and why.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

Can I work out on my own whether my face has lost volume or descended?

Partly. A photograph in even light, taken straight on with the face relaxed, shows where the shadow sits, and comparing it with one from several years ago is genuinely useful. What you cannot do at home is examine how the tissue moves over the bone when the cheek is supported, which is the part that decides the answer. Treat your own comparison as preparation for an examination rather than a substitute for one.

Does my face have to be one or the other?

No. A mixed picture is common and is probably the usual finding after 45, with some genuine loss over the midface and some downward movement of the tissue that remains. The value of the assessment is not a label but a proportion: how much of what you see is shortage and how much is position, because that proportion decides how much of a plan should be volume and how much should be something else.

Is there a scan or a measurement that settles this?

No measurement replaces an examination, and no scan tells you how a face should be treated. The findings that matter are what the tissue does when it is repositioned by hand, how the shadow behaves in even light, and what the face does in movement compared with repose. Those are clinical observations, and they are made at the bedside rather than on a printout.

Risks & Limitations

  • Volume loss and descent are different problems, and adding volume to a face that has descended is the commonest disappointment at this age.
  • Treated skin can leave a pigment mark of its own, and deeper skin tones carry the higher risk.
  • Asymmetry and overcorrection accumulate: each addition is harder to reverse than the last.
  • Surgery repositions tissue for a period. It does not stop the face from continuing to change.

When to Seek Care

  • A mole or mark that changes size, shape or colour, or that bleeds, itches or does not heal.
  • Weakness, drooping or numbness on one side of the face, or facial change over days rather than years.
  • A lump in the neck or under the chin that is new, firm or enlarging, or difficulty swallowing or breathing.
  • Fever with spreading redness, warmth or discharge from a wound, or a wound that opens.

References & Further Reading

  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) — procedure and safety guidance
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, UK) — relevant guidance
  • Cochrane Library — systematic reviews
  • Chinese Medical Association Plastic Surgery Branch — clinical guidance

Medically reviewed by Tongchun Mao, MD (毛彤春), Deputy Director & Head of Aesthetic Surgery. Last reviewed: 19 September 2026.

This page is patient education, not medical advice, and it does not cite individual studies. Discuss your own case with a qualified clinician. To arrange an assessment at Chongqing West District Hospital, see Contact & Consultation.