In short. What should be reviewed each year in your 40s, what should be dropped, and how to tell an escalating plan from one that is actually being managed.

Key points

  • The strongest sign that a plan is being managed well is that it finishes.
  • A review which concludes that nothing should change, or that something should stop, has done its job as completely as one that adds a step.

A plan made at the start of the decade should not be the plan you follow at the end of it. Reviewing it is not the same as arranging the next appointment, and that difference decides whether the plan is being managed or simply extended.

Review is not rebooking

A review needs its own appointment rather than being folded into the next treatment session. Its purpose is to ask whether the plan still matches the face, and that question cannot be asked in the few minutes before an injection. If a review always ends with the next step booked, it was a booking, not a review.

The four questions

Is anything actually different from last year? Is what I am doing still producing a change I can identify? Has anything changed in my health or medication that affects this? And is there a step in the plan I would not begin today if it were proposed now? Those four answers are enough to decide whether to continue, change or stop.

Photographs, not the mirror

Change across a year is smaller than the eye can hold, and a mirror is a poor instrument for it. Photographs taken in the same light, at the same distance, with the same expression are the only record that can be compared honestly. Without them a review becomes a conversation about how you feel rather than evidence.

What should be dropped

Anything that is no longer producing an identifiable change should be stopped. A treatment repeated because it has always been repeated is the commonest way a plan at this age grows without ever being examined, and a skin routine that has accumulated to a dozen products is the same problem in another form. Dropping is the decision people find hardest.

When to change the plan rather than add to it

A plan that has gained a step a year without anything being removed is escalating rather than being managed. If two consecutive reviews have added something and dropped nothing, the plan is the thing that needs reassessing rather than the face. It is also worth asking whether the original finding, volume loss or descent, is still dominant.

A plan that can end

The strongest sign that a plan is being managed well is that it finishes. A review which concludes that nothing should change, or that something should stop, has done its job as completely as one that adds a step.

Reasons to seek review sooner than a year

  • A result that is not what was described, or a change nobody can account for.
  • Pain, firmness, discolouration or altered sensation that persists or worsens after a step.
  • New medication, a new diagnosis or a pregnancy, any of which changes what is safe to plan.

Keep the plan in writing with the review dates in it. A plan that exists only as a series of bookings cannot be reviewed, and a decade is long enough that the plan you started with is unlikely to be the one you finish with.

Related reading

Frequently asked questions

How often should an aesthetic plan be reviewed?

Once a year is enough for most people, and more often than that tends to turn a review into a sales conversation. The exception is a change in your health, your medication or your skin that arrives between reviews, which is a reason to bring it forward. What matters is that the review is a separate appointment with its own purpose rather than a few minutes added to a treatment session.

What if a review concludes that nothing should change?

That is a successful review. A plan that is still matching the face is doing its job, and leaving it alone is a decision rather than an absence of one. The reviews that matter most are the ones that conclude something should stop, because that is the conclusion nobody is paid to reach.

Should I keep having a treatment because it has always worked?

Only if you can say what it is still doing now. A treatment repeated out of habit is the commonest way a plan at this age grows without ever being examined, and the fact that something helped two years ago does not establish that it is helping today. If you cannot describe the change it is producing, the honest step is to stop it and see.

Risks & Limitations

  • Volume loss and descent are different problems, and adding volume to a face that has descended is the commonest disappointment at this age.
  • Treated skin can leave a pigment mark of its own, and deeper skin tones carry the higher risk.
  • Asymmetry and overcorrection accumulate: each addition is harder to reverse than the last.
  • Surgery repositions tissue for a period. It does not stop the face from continuing to change.

When to Seek Care

  • A mole or mark that changes size, shape or colour, or that bleeds, itches or does not heal.
  • Weakness, drooping or numbness on one side of the face, or facial change over days rather than years.
  • A lump in the neck or under the chin that is new, firm or enlarging, or difficulty swallowing or breathing.
  • Fever with spreading redness, warmth or discharge from a wound, or a wound that opens.

References & Further Reading

  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) — procedure and safety guidance
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, UK) — relevant guidance
  • Cochrane Library — systematic reviews
  • Chinese Medical Association Plastic Surgery Branch — clinical guidance

Medically reviewed by Tongchun Mao, MD (毛彤春), Deputy Director & Head of Aesthetic Surgery. Last reviewed: 19 September 2026.

This page is patient education, not medical advice, and it does not cite individual studies. Discuss your own case with a qualified clinician. To arrange an assessment at Chongqing West District Hospital, see Contact & Consultation.